17th and 18th Century Philosophy (PHIL 318) | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Reading and Essay ScheduleRequired Texts • Garrett Thomson, Bacon to Kant: An Introduction to Modern Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Waveland Press, 2002). [ISBN: 1-57766-201-6] • René Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, 3rd ed., translated by Donald A. Cress (Hackett, 1993), 72 pp. [ISBN: (0-87220-192-9)/(978-0-87220-192-7)] • John Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, abridged and edited, with an introduction, by Kenneth P. Winkler (Hackett, 1996), 416 pp. [ISBN: (0-87220-216-X)/(978-0-87220-216-0)] • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Discourse On Metaphysics and Other Essays, translated by Daniel Garber and Roger Ariew (Hackett, 1991), 96 pp. [ISBN: (0-87220-132-5)/(978-0-87220-132-3)] • George Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous, edited by Robert M. Adams (Hackett, 1979), 137 pp. [ISBN: (0-915144-61-1)/(978-0-915144-61-7)] • David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 2nd ed., edited by Eric Steinberg (Hackett, 1993), 151 pp. [ISBN: (0-87220-229-1)/(978-0-87220-229-0)] • Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Werner Pluhar, abridged by Eric Watkins (Hackett, 1996), 229 pp. [ISBN: 0-87220-448-0)] • Selections (either distributed in class or else available with links, below) from the works of Bacon, Hobbes, Spinoza, and Kant. | ||
Wed, Feb 3 Inventing Modernity Descartes to Leibniz Fri, Feb 5 Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy Reading: Thomson, 14-20; René Descartes, “Meditation One” Essay: In his First Meditation, Descartes raises several reasons for doubting some of his beliefs. What are these reasons? Which beliefs are affected? And what is he trying to accomplish with this project? [rubric] Additional Material • Video: Three Minute Descartes [video] • Video: Mark Steel on Descartes’ Doubt (6m 18s) [video] More Steel on Descartes: [1/3 (9m 24s)] [2/3 (9m 39s)] [3/3 (10m 8s)] • Audio: Barry Stroud on Skepticism (Philosophy Bites)(12m 51s) [audio] • Video: Descartes and the Matrix (1m 42s) [video] Mon, Feb 8 Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy Reading: Thomson, 20-25; René Descartes, “Meditation Two” Essay: In the Second Meditation, Descartes conducts an experiment with a piece of wax. What does he conclude from this experiment? [rubric] Additional Material • Audio: A. C. Grayling on Descartes’ Cogito (Philosophy Bites)(12m 50s) [audio] Wed, Feb 10 Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy Reading: Thomson, 26-35; René Descartes, “Meditation Three” Essay: In the Third Meditation, Descartes offers two proofs of God’s existence. Describe and evaluate the first proof. [rubric] Fri, Feb 12 Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy Reading: Thomson, 35-36; René Descartes, “Meditation Four” Essay: Descartes’ discusses the problem of human error in the Fourth Meditation. Why does he stop to do this, and how does he resolve the problem? [rubric] Mon, Feb 15 Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy Reading: Thomson, 37-47; René Descartes, “Meditation Five” Essay: Descartes claims, in his Fifth Meditation, that his ideas of material objects are innate. Why does he think this? What do you think? [rubric] Additional Material Wed, Feb 17 Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy Reading: Thomson, 47-51; René Descartes, “Meditation Six” Essay: Explain the “New Problem of Error” introduced in the Sixth Meditation, and evaluate Descartes’ solution. How is it related to the problem of error discussed in the Fourth Meditation? [rubric] Fri, Feb 19 Spinoza, Ethics: God and Substance Reading: Thomson, 52-64; Spinoza, Ethics, Bk. I Essay: In your own words, summarize Spinoza’s understanding of God. What motivates this view? [rubric] Additional Material • Video: Anthony Quinton on Spinoza and Leibniz [video] • Texts: Jonathan Bennett’s texts from Spinoza: .pdf files of Ethics and Treatise on Theology and Politics [links] Mon, Feb 22 Spinoza, Ethics: Mind and Body Reading: Thomson, 65-73; Spinoza, Ethics, Bk. II Essay: Compare the mind-body relationship as explained by Descartes and by Spinoza. [rubric] Additional Material • Video: Nigel Warburton on Spinoza [video] Wed, Feb 24 Spinoza, Ethics: Knowledge Reading: Thomson, 74-79 Essay: Briefly discuss Spinoza’s view of final causation. Be sure to cite your supporting passages from the Ethics, pt. 1 (appendix and elsewhere). [rubric] Fri, Feb 26 Leibniz: Truth and Reason Reading: Thomson, 80-91; Leibniz, Discourse on Metaphysics Essay: Reflect on Leibniz’s Discourse on Metaphysics (§§8-9) and Monadology (§33), and then explain what Leibniz is claiming here. [rubric] • Texts: Jonathan Bennett’s texts from Leibniz: .pdf files of many texts, including his Discourse on Metaphysics, Principles of Nature and Grace, and Monadology [links] Mon, Mar 1 Leibniz: Monads Reading: Thomson, 92-100; Leibniz, Monadology Essay: Describe Leibniz’s view of causation, as based on a close reading of Discourse (§14) and Monadology (§7). [rubric] Wed, Mar 3 Leibniz: God and Space Reading: Thomson, 101-08 Essay: Re-state Leibniz’s argument for God’s existence, as given in the Monadology (§§38-45). [rubric] Fri, Mar 5 First Exam Hobbes to Hume Mon, Mar 8 Bacon: The New Science Reading: Thomson, 113-25; Bacon, “Aphorisms” from the Novum Organum (1620) [text] Essay: What is an “idol of the mind” (as Bacon uses the term)? By way of examples, explain Bacon’s account of the idols of the mind. [rubric] Wed, Mar 10 Hobbes: Science and Nature Reading: Thomson, 126-36; Hobbes, Leviathan, introduction and Pt. 1, chs. 1 & 6 [text] Essay: Hobbes draws an analogy in the opening paragraph of his Leviathan. Explain this analogy, and then evaluate it. Do you find it compelling? Problematic? [rubric] • Texts: Jonathan Bennett’s texts from Hobbes: .pdf files from Leviathan [links] Fri, Mar 12 Hobbes: Psychology and Politics Reading: Thomson, 137-43; Hobbes, Leviathan, Pt. I, chs. 11, 13-14; Pt. II, chs. 17-18, 21 [text] Essay: Briefly outline Hobbes’ argument as to why we should abandon the natural state and relinquish some of our power to a sovereign. Are you convinced? [rubric] Mon, Mar 15 Locke: Innate Ideas Reading: Thomson, 144-59; Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Bk. I, chs. 1-2. Essay: What sort of ideas does Descartes believe that we have innately, and why does he think this? Do Locke’s arguments give us good reason to reject Descartes’ claims? [rubric] Additional Material • Video: Three Minute Locke [video] • Texts: Jonathan Bennett’s texts from Locke: .pdf files of Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Second Treatise of Government [links] Wed, Mar 17 Locke: Ideas and Qualities Reading: Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Bk. II, ch. 1-9. Essay: How does Locke define and distinguish ideas and qualities? Be sure to examine a few examples of each. [rubric] Fri, Mar 19 Locke: Simple and Complex Ideas Reading: Thomson, 160-69; Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Bk. II, chs. 10-14. Essay: What does Locke claim about simple and complex ideas? Examples? [rubric] Mon, Mar 22 Locke: Words and Things Reading: Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Bk. III, chs. 1-3. Essay: How does Locke define real and nominal essence? Examples? [rubric] |
Wed, Mar 24 Locke: Knowledge ... Reading: Thomson, 170-81; Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Bk. IV, chs. 9-10. Essay: What does it mean to know something, according to Locke? What sorts of things can we know? [rubric] Fri, Mar 26 Locke: ... and its Limits Reading: Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Bk. IV, ch. 11. Essay: Explain the difference that Locke draws between knowledge of myself, of God, and of physical objects. [rubric] —————Spring Break!————— Mon, Apr 5 Berkeley: Immaterialism Reading: Thomson, 182-97; George Berkeley, Three Dialogues, “First Dialogue” Essay: What does Berkeley mean when he claims that matter does not exist? Be sure to illustrate your discussion with some examples. [rubric] Additional Material • Website: Whitehall Museum House (Berkeley’s residence in Rhode Island) [web] • Texts: Jonathan Bennett’s texts from Berkeley: .pdf files of Principles of Human Knowledge, Three Dialogues, and Alciphron [links] Wed, Apr 7 Berkeley: God Reading: Thomson, 198-207; George Berkeley, Three Dialogues, “Second Dialogue” Essay: Describe and evaluate Berkeley’s argument for God’s existence and nature. How does this god differ from the evil demon in Descartes’s “First Meditation”? [rubric] Fri, Apr 9 Berkeley: Common Sense Reading: George Berkeley, Three Dialogues, “Third Dialogue” Essay: Philonous claims that immaterialism is closer to common sense than materialism. What do you think? [rubric] Mon, Apr 12 Hume: Ideas and Impressions Reading: Thomson, 208-17; David Hume, Inquiry, §2-3 Essay: Compare Locke and Hume on their accounts of the origin and nature of sensible ideas. [rubric] Additional Material • Video: Three Minute Hume [video] • Video: BBC special on Hume [video] • Video: John Passmore on Hume (Brian Magee interview) [video] • Texts: Jonathan Bennett’s texts from Hume: .pdf files of the Treatise of Human Nature, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, and Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion [links] Wed, Apr 14 Hume: Relations of Ideas and Matters of Fact Reading: Thomson, 218-28; David Hume, Inquiry, §4 Essay: Explain Hume’s account of causation, and why he thinks it is illusory. [rubric] Fri, Apr 16 Hume: Naturalism Reading: Thomson, 218-28; David Hume, Inquiry, §5 Essay: What is naturalism, and in what sense does this characterize Hume’s thought? [Not sure about what naturalism is? This article might help.] [rubric] Mon, Apr 19 Hume: Necessary Connection Reading: Thomson, 229-41; David Hume, Inquiry, §7 Essay: What does Hume mean by ‘power’ or ‘necessary connection’? Whence does this idea arise? [rubric] Wed, Apr 21 Hume: Miracles Reading: David Hume, Inquiry, §10 Essay: Explain and evaluate Hume’s argument for rejecting miraculous claims. [rubric] Fri, Apr 23 Second Exam Kant Mon, Apr 26 Kant: On Enlightenment Reading: Kant, “What is Enlightenment?” (1784) [text] Essay: What does Kant mean by ‘enlightenment’? Are you and those around you enlightened? If not, what must happen for enlightenment to occur? [rubric] Additional Material • Text: Kant’s Writings [web] • Text: Kant’s Life [web] • Video: Three Minute Kant [video] • Video: Geoffrey Warnock on Kant (Brian Magee interview) [video] Wed, Apr 28 Kant: On Morality Reading: Kant, Foundations for a Metaphysics of Morals (1785) [text] Essay: Choose one of Kant’s four illustrations of applying the first formulation of the categorical imperative and explain how the duty follows from the application. [rubric] Additional Material • Text: Robert Johnson, “Kant’s Moral Philosophy” [SEP] • Video: Three Minute Kant [video] • Texts: Jonathan Bennett’s texts from Kant: .pdf files of several texts, including parts of the Critique of Pure Reason, Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics, Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morality, and Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science [links] Fri, Apr 30 Kant: The Revolutionary Reading: Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Preface A and B, Introduction. Essay: What is revolutionary about Kant’s “Copernican revolution”? Why is a critique of pure reason needed, and what is this critique supposed to accomplish? [rubric] Additional Material • Text: Matt McCormick, “Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics” [IEP] • Text: Paul Guyer, “Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics” [Routledge] • Audio: Adrian Moore explains Kant’s Metaphysics (Philosophy Bites)(19m 58s) [audio] • Video: Kant and the Matrix (1m 56s) [video] Mon, May 3 Kant: On Space and Time Reading: Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Transcendental Aesthetic (B33-58). Essay: In your own words, explain why Kant believes that space and time must be a priori intuitions. [rubric] Additional Material Wed, May 5 Kant: On Concepts Reading: Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (B74-76, 89-95, 102-9). Essay: Briefly describe and evaluate Kant’s metaphysical deduction of the categories. Are you convinced? [rubric] Additional Material Fri, May 7 Kant: The Transcendental Deduction Reading: Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (B116-69). Essay: What does Kant mean by ‘transcendental unity of apperception’, and what role does this unity play in the Transcendental Deduction? [rubric] Additional Material Mon, May 10 Kant: The Analytic of Principles Reading: Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (B198-256). Essay: Briefly describe Kant’s “Second Analogy”. Does this answer Hume’s worries about causation? [rubric] Additional Material Wed, May 12 Kant: The Paralogisms Reading: Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (B274-79, 350-55, 362-66, 406-413). Essay: What is the self, according to Kant? How does this account of the self compare with Descartes’? [rubric] Additional Material Fri, May 14 Kant: The Antinomies Reading: Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (B432-37, 448-79). Essay: Choose any of the four antinomies. Explain why Kant believes that it is an antinomy. Do you find both arguments compelling? [rubric] Additional Material Finals Week Third Exam | ||
Manchester College // Registrar // Department of Religion and Philosophy // Last updated: 21 Apr 2010 |