 |
Evaluation
I will be grading you based on your research strategies, effort, your paper,
and your presentation. For your research strategies, I need to see you
doing the research and taking notes of information you are thinking of using.
For effort, I will be looking for how hard you worked, whether you asked and
answered questions of your peers, and whether or not you used the writing
process as you have been taught. Your paper will be graded on
content, structure, mechanics, length, and visual aids. The presentation
assessment will be based on voice level and clarity (could everyone understand
you) and content (did you teach us about your planet and use visual aids).
|
Beginning
1
|
Developing
2
|
Accomplished
3
|
Exemplary
4
|
Score
|
|
Research Strategies
|
Did not really do much research.
Looked at one website but took no notes.
|
Looked at a few websites but did
not spend much time on them. Only took a few notes that were not very
descriptive.
|
Looked at all the websites listed.
Notes were taken and used for the paper.
|
Looked at every website listed and took good notes. The notes were
used in the writing of the paper and were used well.
|
|
|
Effort
|
Did not spend much time or effort on working. Was little or no
communication with peers. Did not use the writing process.
|
Spent some time working on the project but not much. Asked questions of
peers but rarely answered any of their questions. Used only a few steps of
the writing process. |
Worked on the project during every assigned time. Communicated
with peers regularly. Completed every step of the writing process.
|
Spent time working on the project during the assigned times and outside
of these times as well. Communicated with peers at every opportunity and
was very helpful. Every part of the writing process was completed.
|
|
|
Paper content, structure, and mechanics. The length and visual aids of
paper. |
The paper showed many errors in content, structure, and mechanics. It did
not meet the length requirement and there were no visual aids. |
The paper showed a few errors in content, structure, and mechanics. The paper
met the required length but the visual aids were insufficient. |
The paper showed minor errors in content, structure, and mechanics. The
length was good and the visual aids were applicable. |
The paper showed no errors in content, structure, and mechanics.
The length was met and the visual aids were outstanding.
|
|
|
Voice level and clarity during presentation
|
Student could barely be heard. What was heard was not very clear or
understandable. |
The student can be heard most of the time. Clarity is improving but still
struggling to understand what is being said. |
The student is heard and understood. |
The student uses great voice
levels and has no problems being understood. The presentation was heard
and understood by all.
|
|
|