19th Century Philosophy (PHIL 320)

Writing

SHORT ESSAYS

About once each week (on average) a one to two page essay on the day’s reading will be due (and it is due BEFORE THE CLASS PERIOD for which it is assigned). An essay topic is provided for nearly every day (see the Schedule page, but you need to complete only twelve of these for full credit, with the following distribution: two on Hegel, one on Schopenhauer, and three each on Marx, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche.

Because of your ability to choose which essays to write, I will not accept any late essays.

Each essay should be a succinct and beautifully written response to the given prompts, which are found on the Reading Schedule. Please turn in these essays through Canvas, in the appropriate drop-box (your first essay goes into box E-1, your second into E-2, and so on). These will be graded on length, content, and basic mechanics (see the rubric). Please type these up in a word processor, and give them a good proof-reading before uploading into the appropriate essay-number in Canvas.

Length: 500-600 words (this is not much, so you need to be succinct).

DAILY DISCUSSION PARAGRAPHS

A one-paragraph discussion on some brief passage in the reading will be due at 9:00 a.m. before each class session. This passage is of your own choosing, so long as it doesn’t overlap with the topic of the short essay for that day; it could be a single sentence that puzzles you or that you find interesting. These daily discussion paragraphs are due by 9:00 AM (type these up as a Word document, then upload the file into the appropriate "Discussion Forum" post on Canvas). Each paragraph will be graded following a 5 pt. rubric.

Format: If the passage is short, type it out; otherwise, indicate its location. Follow this with your one-paragraph discussion. Use this sample submission as a guide:

Heraclitus, Fr. 118: “A dry soul is wisest and best.”

Heraclitus mentions the four standard kinds of stuffs (fire, air, water, earth), and he seems to associate the soul with fire, which is also associated with logos, which makes sense. The soul (or mind) would be analogous to fire (or perhaps he intended it to be literally a kind of fire), always changing, but also retaining a kind of unity (namely, the continuity of the flame). Would Heraclitus have thought that each of our minds was part of the basic cosmic fire that ordered (or was the order of) the universe?

Academic Dishonesty [top]

Feel free to stop by my office with any questions you might have about what might constitute plagiariasm, but see also this useful resource found on the library website.

[The following text is copied from the university Catalog]

Membership in the Manchester University community requires a devotion to the highest principles of academic and personal integrity, a commitment to maintain honor, and a continuous regard for the rights of others. There can be no rights without individual responsibility.

Manchester University faculty are committed to teaching and learning as a career and a profession. Each instructor is presumed to develop and use methods and techniques which enhance learning and which best fit his or her personality and subject matter area. At the same time, the instructor is expected to abide by the general principles of responsible teaching which are commonly accepted by the academic profession. These principles suggest that faculty keep complete records of student performance and that they develop and apply express, uniform criteria for evaluating student performance.

Students are free to take reasoned exception to the data or views offered in any course of study. While they may reserve judgment about matters of opinion, they are responsible for learning the content of any course in which they are enrolled. At the same time, students are expected to abide by the general principles of academic honesty which are commonly accepted in educational settings.

When a student chooses not to follow the general principles of academic honesty, the following policies and procedures bear their sad fruit.

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is the presentation of information (either written or oral) as one’s own when some or all of the information was derived from some other source.

Specific types of plagiarism encountered in written and oral assignments include the following:

● Sources have been properly identified, but excerpts have been quoted without proper use of quotation marks; or the material has been slightly modified or rephrased rather than restated in the student’s own words.

● Key ideas or items of information derived from specific sources that present material that is not common knowledge have been presented without proper identification of the source or sources.

● Unidentified excerpts from other sources have been woven into the student’s own presentation.

● A paper or speech may be a mosaic of excerpts from several sources and presented as the student’s own.

● An entire paper or speech has been obtained from some other source and presented as the student’s own.

● Texts in another language are translated into English and presented as the student’s own.

Cheating

Cheating consists of any unpermitted use of notes, texts or other sources so as to give an unfair advantage to a student in completing a class assignment or an examination. Intentionally aiding another student engaged in academic dishonesty is also considered cheating.

Submission of the same work (essay, speech, art piece, etc.) to fulfill assignments in separate classes requires the permission of both faculty members (if both courses are being taken in the same semester), or the permission of the second faculty member (if they are taken during different semesters).

Penalties

• Unintentional Plagiarism. In cases of plagiarism in which no deception is intended (such as ignorance of proper citation of sources), the student should expect a reduction in the paper’s grade; in some cases, the student may be given an option to rewrite the paper. No disciplinary letter will be filed.

• Deliberate Plagiarism and Cheating. In cases of deliberate plagiarism, and in all cases of cheating and attempted cheating, the work assigned will be failed. At the instructor’s discretion, the student may also fail the course (regardless of the grade-weight of the work assigned).

In either a case of deliberate plagiarism or cheating, a disciplinary letter recording the deception will be sent to the student, with copies sent to the associate dean of academic resources and the student’s academic advisor. For more information, as well as for information regarding your rights of appeal, see the MU Source.

Manchester University // Registrar // Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies // Last updated: 24 Nov 2016